English - Espanol - 简体 - 繁體
Inhouse Co Attorney banner

Based in Silicon Valley and Orange County, Inhouse Co. is a law firm specializing in litigation, estate planning, business transactions and intellectual property prosecution. We have over 25 years of experience and a proven track record of success in litigation and IP related matters.  Our clients include corporations as well as business minded individuals

Below are some of the litigation successes we obained:

Kalantari v. NITV, Inc., 352 F.3d 1202 (9th Cir. Cal. 2003)

A published opinion by the 9th Circuit Court. In an Appeal from the U.S. District Court,9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed District Court's summary judgement concerning Copyrights and embargo issued by President Clinton.

Rexall sundown v. Mathias Rath

A 5.5 week jury trial in Florida. Inhouse Co. obtained favorable jury verdict against major law firm GreenberfTraurig in a case concerning intellectual property royalties disputes. The original disputed amount exceeded $250 million dollars.

Momento, Inc v. Seccion Amarilla USA

A copyright and antitrust case in Nor.Cal.. Inhouse Co. obtained favorable settlement against major law firm Mayer Brown in a case reminiscent to David v.Goliath in which the defendant is owned by one of the weathliest man in the world, Carlos Slim.

Mathias Rath v. Advance Biomedical Research

A 7 day Aarbitration hearing in New York. Inhouse Co. obtained judgment in excess of $900,000 against against New York firm McElroy Deustsch Mulvaney & Carpenter in a case concerning clinical trial research dispute.

Class action CLRA claims against VW, Chrysler and Nissan Dearlers

Inhouse Co represents Volks Wagon, Chrysler and Nissan dealerships in defending various Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) class action claims.

MAKS Broadcasting Inc., v. Kiumarz Lenahard Inc. et al.

Prevailed at trial in defense of claim exceeding $2.5 million dollars in a landlord/tenant matter before Judge Terry Friedman is an author of TRG Landlord Tenant practice guide for lawyers.

Tan Tee Tan v. U.S. Bank, et al. (October 2010)

Successfully represented two co-defendants (J&J Seafoods, Inc.),in a two-phase trial, against a claim of conversion and punitive damages in a jury trial, which resulted in dismissal of both defendants.

Chattery International Inc., v. Jolida, Inc., (March 2011)

Successfully defeated PlaintiffÕs Preliminary Injunction in the United States District Court The District of Maryland concerning trademark infringement which resulted in a published opinion by District Judge William D. Quarles, Jr.

Modern Fence Technologies Inc. v. Qualipac Home Improvements Corp. (April 2011)

Successfully represented defendant in The United States District Court Eastern District of Milwaukee concerning trademark infringement and antitrust matters in a jury trial, which resulted in full dismissal of the defendant and the invalidation of plaintiffÕs trademarks (Reg. 291700 & Reg. 3337669).

Below are samples of U.S.Patents we obained:


home | practices | professionals | services & fees | about us | careers | contact us